Is artistic talent inherited? That’s a question I’ve been pondering lately.
Whenever someone learns that my mum is an artist and then that her father was an artist too, and also my Dad was an architect, I often get a knowing smile.
“Well, there you go. That’s where your talent came from. You inherited it.”
And perhaps I did.
Maybe I inherited a sensitivity to colour. Maybe I inherited an eye for shape and pattern. Maybe I inherited a love of drawing. But the older I get, the more I wonder what we really mean when we talk about artistic talent. Is it something we’re born with? Is it something that develops over time, as we put in the hours of work? Or is the answer somewhere in between?
The more artists I meet, the less certain I become.
At Some Point, Someone Had to Be First
My grandfather, Newton Brett, was an artist at heart. He worked during the day (as a commercial artist) and painted in the evenings and on weekends. My mum, Joanne Sibley, is an artist. My father, Jeremy Sibley, would often sketch and paint.
Looking at that family tree, it’s easy to conclude that artistic talent simply runs in the bloodline. In fact, that’s often the assumption people make.
And maybe there’s something to it.
But the thing is, as far as I know, neither side of my family has a history of artists stretching back beyond my grandparents. And on my Dad’s side, nothing before him!
At some point, someone had to be first.
I keep returning to that thought because it complicates the story.
My grandfather didn’t emerge from a dynasty of painters. He was born to a farming family in Manitoba. Somehow, somewhere along the way, he developed an interest in art. He found time to paint around work and family commitments because painting mattered deeply to him.
When I picture him sitting in the dining room with his paints, I’m struck less by the possibility of inherited talent and more by the evidence of his keen dedication. That’s what really resonates for me.
Whatever natural ability he may have possessed, it wouldn’t have amounted to much if he hadn’t actually done the work. Raw talent may have opened the door, but he still had to walk through it.

What Are We Really Seeing?
When someone says, “You’re so talented,” what exactly are they responding to? Seriously.
Are they seeing an innate gift? Or are they seeing the visible result of years spent learning, experimenting, practising, failing, and trying again?
I suspect it’s more of the latter.
The word talent can make art seem effortless. It can make it sound as though a painting emerged because the artist was somehow blessed with a special gift.
As though it arrived fully formed.
As though there weren’t years of learning behind it.
But that’s rarely the whole story.
Every artist has a private collection of paintings that didn’t quite succeed. Colour combinations that looked wonderful in theory but fell flat on the paper. Compositions that didn’t quite work. Experiments that taught valuable lessons but certainly never made it into a frame.
Those experiences at the easel rarely get included in the story. Yet they’re often the very things that help an artist grow.
When we focus only on artistic talent, we can miss the years of persistence that sit invisible behind the work.

What Have I Actually Inherited?
As I’ve said, people often assume that because I come from a family of artists, I inherited artistic talent.
Maybe I did.
But over the years I’ve started wondering if that’s really what was passed down.
Because I’ve met people from wonderfully creative families who have no interest whatsoever in making art. They appreciate it, perhaps, but they feel no pull to paint, draw, sculpt, sew, write, or make things.
And I’ve met artists who seem to have appeared from nowhere. People whose parents weren’t artists. Whose grandparents weren’t artists. People who simply discovered a spark and chose to follow it.
My grandfather did.
My father did too.
Neither came from a long line of artists, yet both devoted themselves to creative pursuits. That fascinates me. Because it suggests that talent alone isn’t enough. After all, what good is artistic talent if you have no desire to use it?
And what happens when someone with no obvious artistic lineage discovers a passion for making art and decides to pursue it?
Perhaps the more interesting question isn’t whether artistic talent is inherited. Perhaps it’s what we do with whatever we inherit. Maybe what I inherited was more than any talent. Maybe it was permission.
Permission to take creativity seriously.
Permission to spend time painting
Permission to believe that art matters.
Growing up, I saw people (my parents, their friends like Susan Alexander) making art. I saw paintings in progress. I saw creativity treated as something worthwhile rather than frivolous. I saw adults who made room for art in their lives, even when they were busy with work and family responsibilities.
That was such a gift.

Maybe It’s a Bit of Both
So, is artistic talent inherited?
Honestly, I don’t know.
Perhaps some aspects are. Perhaps there are natural inclinations that make certain pursuits feel more intuitive. Perhaps some people begin a little further along the art path than others. I won’t dismiss that possibility.
But I’ve never met an artist who became accomplished on talent alone. I’ve met many who became accomplished as an artist because they kept going.
Because they stayed curious and continued learning.
Because they made bad work and then made more work. And even more work.
Because they fell in love with the process.
When I think about my grandfather painting in the dining room after a day’s work, that’s what I remember most. Not the possibility that he inherited artistic talent from someone before him. The fact that he was passionate enough about painting to do it in the evening after working all day.
And perhaps that’s the part of the story we should talk about more often. The hours spent at the easel with no guarantee of success, simply a belief that something worthwhile might emerge.

What Do You Think?
Do you think artistic talent is inherited?
Have you ever seen creativity run through a family?
Or have you seen someone become an artist despite having no obvious artistic background at all?
What do you think is passed from one generation to the next: talent, encouragement, opportunity, permission, persistence, or something else entirely?
And, have you ever assumed someone else’s success came from talent while yours would/could only come from hard work?
I’d really love to hear your thoughts in the comments. The more artists I meet, the more curious I become about where talent ends and dedication begins.
Until next time,
~ Gail
P.S. My two siblings also have creative leanings: my brother loves photography and creates beautiful card designs for his company Freebird Letterpress, while my sister leans towards sculpting, sewing, and designing for her company Talawa Tees (on hold at the moment due to tariffs). Perhaps that supports the inherited-talent theory. Or perhaps it simply means we all grew up in a family where creativity was valued and encouraged. I’m still not sure!
PPS. As I was preparing to publish this post, I heard the news that artist David Hockney died on Thursday (11 June). A favourite artist of mine, he was such a role model of courage and doing art his way. And…his parents were not really artistically inclined but they certainly encouraged him to follow his path and “not worry what the neighbour’s think!” An idea Hockney lived by and one we should all take to heart.
Three wonderful books – two parts of Hockney’s biography and one in conversation with him. (And yes, I receive a small commission from Amazon if you click on the books covers and purchase through these links.)




















